Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael McClenton

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 14, 1995No. 94-1632PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MANSMANN, Circuit Judge.

The government asks us to decide whether a hotel guest room constitutes a “dwelling,” and therefore, whether a burglary of a hotel guest room may be considered a crime of violence for purposes of applying the career offender provision of the Sentencing Guidelines. Because the district court ruled that burglary of a hotel room was not the equivalent of burglary of a dwelling, McClenton was not sentenced as a career offender.

We hold that a hotel guest room, the sole purpose of which is to provide temporary lodging arid a place to sleep, constitutes' a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. Amos Salmon, No. 90-3355, Raymond E. Washington, No. 90-3363, Richard Fitzpatrick, No. 90-3366, John Surratt, No. 90-3438Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. ColladoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Carlyle Eustace Wong, A/K/A Carlyle WongCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. Jorge RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. Timothy Allen WennerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Robert McQuilkinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Murillo-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  5. People v. VillalobosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API