Weinstein v. Rocha
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Appellants Alan and Dorina Weinstein (the Weinsteins), purchasers of real property, appeal from an order enforcing a settlement agreement between them and the seller, respondent Juan Rocha.
The property’s purchase was partially financed by a promissory note in favor of Rocha, secured by a second trust deed. The primary financing was supplied by the holder of the senior first trust deed. Rocha and the Weinsteins later entered into a settlement agreement to dismiss the Weinsteins’ action against Rocha for alleged failed disclosures concerning the sale. The agreement altered the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- DeBerard Properties, Ltd. v. LimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Sully-Miller Contracting Co. v. Gledson/Cashman Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. HammondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wheeler Ridge Farms v. Wildlands Conservancy CA5California Court of Appeal · 2013