Legal Opinion

Weinstein v. Rocha

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 1, 2012No. B235931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

Appellants Alan and Dorina Weinstein (the Weinsteins), purchasers of real property, appeal from an order enforcing a settlement agreement between them and the seller, respondent Juan Rocha.

The property’s purchase was partially financed by a promissory note in favor of Rocha, secured by a second trust deed. The primary financing was supplied by the holder of the senior first trust deed. Rocha and the Weinsteins later entered into a settlement agreement to dismiss the Weinsteins’ action against Rocha for alleged failed disclosures concerning the sale. The agreement altered the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. DeBerard Properties, Ltd. v. LimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Sully-Miller Contracting Co. v. Gledson/Cashman Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Fire Insurance Exchange v. HammondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wheeler Ridge Farms v. Wildlands Conservancy CA5California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API