Legal Opinion

Sully-Miller Contracting Co. v. Gledson/Cashman Construction, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 2002No. B152582PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERREN, J.

Appellants signed documents agreeing to dismiss these actions and release their claims against respondents and another defendant in exchange for the payment of money. Those documents, which were prepared by one of the respondents’ attorneys, did not call for any signatures other than appellants’, nor did they specify who was obligated to make the payments on which the agreements were conditioned. When no payment was forthcoming, appellants gave notice that they were withdrawing their agreement to settle. Several months later, respondents attempted to tender payment, which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weddington Productions, Inc. v. FlickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Levy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Harris v. Rudin, Richman & AppelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Larwin-Southern California, Inc. v. JGB Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1979

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Amanda Sateriale v. R J Reynolds Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Critzer v. EnosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Gauss v. GAF Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. J.B.B. Investment Partners, Ltd. v. FairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Juen v. Alain Pinel Realtors, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API