Fire Insurance Exchange v. Hammond
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HALLER, J.
As a lessor’s insurer, plaintiff Fire Insurance Exchange (FIE) seeks reversal of a summary judgment denying its subrogation claim against the lessees, defendants Reginald Hammond and Sevilla Hammond, for fire damages it attributes to their negligence or the negligence of their guests or invitees. The trial court relied on Parsons Manufacturing Corp. v. Superior Court (1984) 156 Cal.App.3d 1151 [203 Cal.Rptr. 419] {Parsons), in which subrogation was denied on the ground the lessor’s fire policy was for the mutual benefit of the lessor and lessee. We reverse the judgment,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Dix Mutual Insurance v. LaFramboiseIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Sutton v. JondahlCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Cerny-Pickas & Co. v. C. R. Jahn Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Seaco Insurance v. BarbosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Union Mutual Fire Insurance v. JoergSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Rausch v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Tri-Par Investments, L.L.C. v. SousaNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.