Legal Opinion

Fire Insurance Exchange v. Hammond

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 25, 2000No. D033347PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HALLER, J.

As a lessor’s insurer, plaintiff Fire Insurance Exchange (FIE) seeks reversal of a summary judgment denying its subrogation claim against the lessees, defendants Reginald Hammond and Sevilla Hammond, for fire damages it attributes to their negligence or the negligence of their guests or invitees. The trial court relied on Parsons Manufacturing Corp. v. Superior Court (1984) 156 Cal.App.3d 1151 [203 Cal.Rptr. 419] {Parsons), in which subrogation was denied on the ground the lessor’s fire policy was for the mutual benefit of the lessor and lessee. We reverse the judgment,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Dix Mutual Insurance v. LaFramboiseIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Sutton v. JondahlCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. Cerny-Pickas & Co. v. C. R. Jahn Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Seaco Insurance v. BarbosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Union Mutual Fire Insurance v. JoergSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  3. Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. Rausch v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Tri-Par Investments, L.L.C. v. SousaNebraska Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API