Legal Opinion

Wittenberg v. Brown

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 8, 1938No. File No. 38717PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff seeks to recover a sum alleged to be due for rent. After receiving notice from the plaintiff that the rent would be increased from $150 to $200 a month, the defendant continued to occupy the premises for a period of four months. The defendant's claim that he was in possession under a lease for one year at a rent of $150 per month is not sustained by the evidence, and it is found that at the time the defendant received the notice of an increase in the rent he was a tenant from month to month, paying a monthly rental of $150. The question presented is whether the defendant is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Colyear v. TobrinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Tracy v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  3. Abrams v. SherwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Atkinson v. ColeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  5. Margolis v. WiseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DiCostanzo v. TripodiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API