Wittenberg v. Brown
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff seeks to recover a sum alleged to be due for rent. After receiving notice from the plaintiff that the rent would be increased from $150 to $200 a month, the defendant continued to occupy the premises for a period of four months. The defendant's claim that he was in possession under a lease for one year at a rent of $150 per month is not sustained by the evidence, and it is found that at the time the defendant received the notice of an increase in the rent he was a tenant from month to month, paying a monthly rental of $150. The question presented is whether the defendant is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Colyear v. TobrinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Tracy v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Abrams v. SherwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Atkinson v. ColeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Margolis v. WiseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- DiCostanzo v. TripodiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951