Legal Opinion
Van Tassel v. Spring Perch Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 29, 1931PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The defendant The Spring Perch Company is a joint stock corporation organized in 1854 under the statute laws of this State, and the relevant portions of its articles of association read as follows: “Art. 1st. The name of said corporation shall be the Spring Perch Company, which shall be established and located in the city of Bridgeport, county of Fairfield and state of Connecticut.” “Art. 3d. The purposes for which the corporation is established are as follows, viz: The manufacturing of Coach and Carriage Springs of all kinds, Spring Perches, Axles, Machinery, Mechanics Tools, Coach Locks,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Dodge v. WoolseySupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- McConnell v. Combination Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- Stevens v. Rutland & Burlington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1851
- Valluzzo v. ValluzzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bridgeport Pipe Engineering Co. v. DeMatteo Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Kriedel v. KrampitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Dick v. DickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Galdi v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Gerald Park Improvement Assn. v. BiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.