Legal Opinion

Wilson County Board of Education v. Lamm

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1970No. 30PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooRE, J.

Plaintiff claims title by adverse possession for more than twenty years (G.S. 1-40). Defendants admit plaintiff’s possession but contend that it was not adverse but was a permissive possession which was to cease when the property was no longer used for school purposes.

The trial judge correctly charged the jury that plaintiff could acquire title by adverse possession only if the possession was open, notorious, and adverse. In Locklear v. Savage, 159 N.C. 236, 74 S.E. 347, adverse possession is defined as follows:

“. . . It consists in actual possession, with an intent to hold solely for the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Locklear v. . SavageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Morehead v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Hunt v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Gouldin Ex Rel. Wiley v. Inter-Ocean InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Hajmm Co. v. House of Raeford Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Responsible Citizens in Opposition to the Flood Plain Ordinance v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Marina Food Associates, Inc. v. Marina Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Vaughn v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Matter of PeirceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API