Legal Opinion

Matter of Peirce

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 18, 1981No. 8025DC919PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Respondents made 27 assignments of error in the record on appeal. They cite all but one of these assignments of error in support of 13 arguments which they bring forth in their appellate brief.

Defendant initially argues that the trial court erred by striking paragraphs three and four of respondent’s Further Answer and Defense and Counterclaim to the petition to terminate parental rights. Defendant maintains that G.S., Chap. 7A, Art. 24B, “Termination of Parental Rights” allows the respondent in a termination of parental rights case to file counterclaims as part of its…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Matter of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. General Telephone Co. of the SoutheastSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In re R.T.W.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  2. State Ex Rel. McLeod v. C & L CORP. INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Matter of PierceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. In re L.O.K.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. QuickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API