Legal Opinion

State v. Diaz.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 2012No. SCWC-30324PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that the District Court of the First Circuit (the court) 1 erred in denying the November 27, 2009 Second Motion to Set Aside Bail Forfeiture and For Return of Bail (Second Motion) filed by Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee Atmarama D. Diaz (Petitioner) because under the circumstances Petitioner’s incarceration in California established good cause under Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 804-51 (Supp. 2009) for his failure to appear at his August 9, 2004 arraignment, and thus for why the January 15, 2010 bail forfeiture judgment herein should not be executed.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. State v. CamaraHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Saranillio v. SilvaHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. BatesHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. BaylyHawaii Supreme Court · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MottoleseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  2. State v. Villiarimo.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. MottoleseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  4. State v. Vaimili.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. NelsonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API