Legal Opinion

State v. Camara

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1996No. 18606PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOON, Chief Justice.

Surety-appellant Aloha Bail Bonds (Aloha or the surety) appeals from an order of the circuit court denying its motion to set aside a judgment of forfeiture of an appearance bond (motion to set aside). On appeal, Aloha contends that the circuit court erred in determining that a judgment of forfeiture may be set aside only if the movant shows good cause for the defendant’s failure to appear in court when required. For the reasons discussed below, we hold that the circuit court’s interpretation of Hawaii’s forfeiture statute was unduly restrictive. We therefore vacate the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Franks v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Sato v. TawataHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Pele Defense Fund v. Puna Geothermal VentureHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Housing Finance & Development Corp. v. CastleHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Makeig v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Gray v. Administrative Director of CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple v. SullivanHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. CullenHawaii Supreme Court · 1997

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API