Legal Opinion

State v. Bates

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1997No. 18121PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NAKAYAMA, Justice.

Following a jury trial, Jesse James Arruda Bates (defendant) was convicted on February 10, 1994 of one count of racketeering, pursuant to Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 842-2(3) (1993), and one count of extortion in the first degree, pursuant to HRS § 707-765(l)(b) (1993). On appeal he raises four issues for consideration: (1) the 686 inaudible entries in the trial transcript prevent appellate counsel from engaging in a meaningful review of the record in order to determine error, therefore requiring a new trial; (2) the trial court erred in holding that HRS § 842-2(3), and…

2Cases cited89 opinions

  1. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Draper v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. Michael G. Thevis, Alton Bart Hood, Global Industries, Inc., Anna Jeanette EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. RichieHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. KaneHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. BaylyHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. CabreraHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  5. United Public Workers, AFSCME, Local 646 v. YogiHawaii Supreme Court · 2002

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API