Legal Opinion

State v. Vaimili.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 2013No. SCWC-12-0000034PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that the Circuit Court of the First Circuit (the court) 1 was right in denying the Motion for Relief from Forfeiture of Bail Bond filed on November 2, 2011 (November 2 Motion for Relief) by Petitioner/Surety-Appellant Freedom Bail Bonds (Petitioner). In doing so we conclude that (1) the November 2 Motion for Relief could not be brought under Hawaii Rules of Civil Procedure (HRCP) Rule 60(b) 2 because pursuant to HRCP Rule 81(a)(8), 3 the rules of civil procedure do not apply to bond forfeiture proceedings, (2) the statement in Hawaii Revised Statutes…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & WrightHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. CamaraHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. MosesHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  4. United States v. PlechnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. Esteban.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MilesHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State v. NelsonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. State v. BrackHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API