Legal Opinion
State v. Mottolese
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided June 12, 2015No. 14-245PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1.
Skoglund, J.
Appellant Allstate Bail Bonds (“Allstate”) challenges the trial court’s decision granting the State’s motion for forfeiture of bond. On appeal, Allstate argues that the trial court abused its discretion in declining to reduce the amount of bail forfeiture when Allstate could not produce defendant due to his *472out-of-state incarceration. We agree that Allstate is entitled to a reduction in bail forfeiture, and therefore reverse.
¶ 2. On June 17, 2013, defendant was arraigned for grand larceny and possession of stolen property. Two days later, the court set bail at $35,000.…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Hudson v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- United States v. John Wesley Egan and Bryan John Hill, and Stuyvesant Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MottoleseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- State v. Kory L. GeorgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2022
- State v. Joshua AndersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- State v. HeffernanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- State v. MottoleseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.