Legal Opinion
Bosch v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided April 8, 2014No. Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-00656-JHMPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
JOSEPH H. McKINLEY, JR., Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim and Motion to Strike [DN 36] of Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals (“Bayer”). Fully briefed, this matter is ripe for decision. For the following reasons, the Court holds that Bayer’s motion to dismiss [DN 36] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. Background
This action concerns Mirena®, an intrauterine contraceptive system which was designed, manufactured, tested, marketed, and distributed by Bayer. (See Am. Compl.…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- League of United Latin American Citizens v. BredesenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Clayton Coffey v. Foamex L.P., and Recticel Foam CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Red Hed Oil, Inc. v. H.T. Hackney Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2017
- Sims v. Atrium Med. Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2018
- Estate of DeMoss ex rel. DeMoss v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2017
- Nwanguma v. TrumpDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2017
- Back v. Ray Jones Trucking, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.