Legal Opinion

Bottass v. Bottass

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 26, 1996No. 13450; 14100PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.

The defendants Judith Bekasi and John Bekasi1 appeal from the trial court’s refusal to grant the defendants’ postjudgment motion to correct the judgment file. On appeal, the defendants claim that the trial court improperly refused to correct the judgment file that did not conform to the trial court’s previous oral memorandum of decision. The plaintiff, Richard Bottass, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the defendants’ motion for an order compelling the plaintiff to remove his vehicles from a common driveway and parking area so that it could be repaired. On appeal, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Blake v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Connecticut Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. MilanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Kuras v. KopeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Franc v. Bethel Holding Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. Cusano v. Burgundy Chevrolet, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  3. Vasquez v. Superior CourtConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  4. Commissioner of Human Resources v. Holmes, No. Fa89-0050364 (Aug. 31, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API