Legal Opinion
Cusano v. Burgundy Chevrolet, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 9, 1999No. AC 18212PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
The defendants, Burgundy Chevrolet, Inc. (Chevrolet), and Ismael Velazquez, appeal following the trial court’s granting of the motion filed by the plaintiff, Florence Cusano, to open a judgment of nonsuit. The defendants claim that the court lacked the authority to open the judgment of nonsuit because the plaintiff failed to file the motion to open within the four month period set forth in General Statutes § 52-212a1 and Practice Book § 17-4 (a).1 2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*657The following facts are relevant to the resolution of this appeal. On December…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. CostleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Kim v. MagnottaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Solomon v. KeiserSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Ravizza v. WaldieConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- G. F. Construction, Inc. v. Cherry Hill Construction, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. City of MiddletownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Johnson v. Atlantic Health Services, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Milazzo v. SchwartzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Kiniry v. KiniryConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Sanzo v. SanzoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.