Toomey Ex Rel. Burtson v. Krone
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, Justice.
This appeal is taken from an order of the Anoka County District Court. In ruling on cross-motions for summary judgment, the court held that an insurance policy which excluded liability coverage to an insured’s relatives if they owned their own vehicles, regardless of whether those vehicles were insured, did not violate Minnesota law. We affirm.
The relevant policy provisions are as follows:
Coverage A.
Company agrees to pay all damages the insured becomes legally obligated to pay because of (a) bodily injury to any person arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use, including…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Limpert v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Henry Farber and Sam Levy, Third-Party v. Great American Insurance Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Iverson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Jones v. FalconLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lobeck v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Progressive Specialty Insurance Co. v. Widness Ex Rel. WidnessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Hilden v. Iowa National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Gunderson v. Classified Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Crews v. Criterion Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.