Legal Opinion

People v. Narron

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 1987No. A033024PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WHITE, P. J.

Appellant contests the validity of a condition of probation requiring him to make restitution to Lake County for expenses incurred in disposing of dangerous chemicals found in appellant’s residence. He claims that neither Penal Code section 1203.1 nor 1203.04 authorizes the condition, because the county was not a direct victim of his crimes and the expenses incurred in destroying the chemicals were not related to any crime to which he pled guilty. We need not ultimately resolve these contentions because, as will be seen, the manner in which the condition was imposed was…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. National Assn. of Railroad PassengersSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. GiordanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. People v. BlankenshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API