Legal Opinion
Rembold v. Pacific First Federal Savings Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 3, 1986No. 85-3946PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Wayne C. Rembold and Karen D. Rembold (hereinafter the Rembolds), appeal from the district court’s order dismissing their complaint against Pacific First Federal Savings Bank (hereinafter Pacific First) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because the Rembolds alleged violations of federal securities laws, state securities statutes, and common law fraud and negligence, the district court had subject matter jurisdiction over this matter.
We review the dismissal of a complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as a pure question of law reviewable de…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jackson v. First Federal Sav. of Arkansas, FADistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1988
- In Re Roxford Foods LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1991
- Cathedral Candle Co. v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Rembold v. Pacific First Federal Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Reschini v. First FederalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995