Legal Opinion
In Re Roxford Foods Litigation
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 25, 1991No. CV-F-89-846 REC, CV-F-91-009 REC and CV-F-91-010 RECPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDERS RE MOTIONS
COYLE, Chief Judge.
On October 7, 1991, the court heard Purina Mills, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Norbest, Inc’s Counter-Motion for Summary Judgment, Norbest, Inc’s Motion to Strike Evidence, and the United States Department of Agriculture’s Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief.
Upon due consideration of the written and oral arguments of the parties and the record herein, the court issues its rulings with respect to these motions for the reasons set forth herein.
A. Motion to Strike.
Norbest moves to strike numerous aver-ments in the respective declarations of Mark A.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- William E. Brock, Iii, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Writers Guild of America, West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Animal Science Products, Inc. v. China National Metals & Minerals Import & Export Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Jackson v. Swift-EckrichDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1993
- Overton Power District No. 5 v. WatkinsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1993
- Angga v. Bumble Bee Foods, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
- Foothill Church v. WatanabeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.