Legal Opinion

Cathedral Candle Co. v. United States International Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 9, 2005No. 2004-1083Published

1Opinion of the Court

400 F.3d 1352

CATHEDRAL CANDLE COMPANY and The A.I. Root Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION and Deanna Tanner Okun, Chairman, United States International Trade Commission, Defendants-Appellees, and

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection and Robert C. Bonner, Commissioner, Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-1083.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 9, 2005.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Steven M. Schneebaum, Patton Boggs LLP, of Washington, DC, argued…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API