Legal Opinion

In re Samad

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 2012No. 11-BG-776PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

Having found that Respondent, Richard A. Samad, committed 40 violations of 14 different Rules of Professional Conduct in six matters, the Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended: (1) that Respondent be suspended for the maximum period of three years; (2) that Re*489spondent should be required to demonstrate his fitness to practice law before he is reinstated; and (3) that, as a condition of reinstatement, Respondent should be required to make restitution to one of his clients, Mr. Williams, in the amount of $2,500 plus interest at the legal rate. The facts underlying the Board’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Monroe v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Matter of ShorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. In Re HallmarkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. In Re RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Tucker v. LowerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In Re Olekanma A. Ekekwe-KauffmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. In re Hawver (Supreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. Rocha v. Brown & Gould, LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  4. In re Catherine E. AbbeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. In re Mba-JonasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API