Legal Opinion

United States v. Harrell

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 3, 1933No. 802PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POLLOCK, District Judge.

This is an action brought against the United States to recover on a' $5,000 policy of war risk insurance. The trial was to the court, jury trial being waived in writing. At the close of all the evidence, counsel for the appellant requested special findings of fact and conclusions of law, and moved for judgment in favor of the government. The court overruled the motion and made findings in favor of the appellee and entered judgment thereon. The appellant saved an exception to' the overruling of its motion for judgment. From such findings and judgment, the appellant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nicolay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  2. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  3. United States v. RentfrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  4. United States v. TyrakowskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
  5. United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. McShaneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  2. United States v. DerrickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  3. United States v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  4. United States v. RyeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  5. Grate v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API