Legal Opinion
Nicolay v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 30, 1931No. 395PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
The appellant (plaintiff below) sued on a war risk insurance policy which had lapsed for nonpayment of premiums on May 2,1919. His claim.is that he was totally and permanently disabled on or before that date. At the conclusion of all the evidence, the court directed a verdict for the United States. The correctness of that ruling is the only question in the case. If there is no substantial evidence of total and permanent disability on or before May 2, 1919, the trial court was right; otherwise not. Woolworth Co. v. Davis (C. C. A. 10) 41 F.(2d) 342; Waddell v. Guthrie…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ToopsSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- United States v. SlighCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Berry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Eggen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- United States v. DiehlCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- Wise v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.