Legal Opinion

United States v. Rentfrow

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 18, 1932No. 608PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.

After a trial without a jury upon a war risk insurance policy, the court found specially that the insured was suffering from pulmonary tuberculosis when discharged from the service on July 12, 1919 ; that its progress was never arrested, and that his death on May 10, 1930, was a result thereof; and that he was permanently and totally disabled on July 12, 1919, while his policy was in force. Unless then matured, the poliey sued on lapsed August 31, 1919. At the close of the evidence, the government moved for a judgment on the ground that the proof was not sufficient to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eggen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. Nicolay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  3. Roberts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  4. Hirt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  5. Humble v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1931

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Falbo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  2. Massachusetts Protective Ass'n v. MouberCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  3. United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  4. United States v. PetersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  5. United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API