Legal Opinion

United States v. Rye

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 5, 1934No. 930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit on a war risk insurance contract. Trial by jury was waived. The court found that plaintiff became totally and permanently disabled on November 10, 1918, while the policy was in force. Judgment was rendered accordingly and the ease came here on appeal.

It is contended that the finding of total and permanent disability is not supported by substantial evidence. A proper motion was interposed at the close of the evidence. That presents the question for review. The burden was upon plaintiff to establish by substantial evidence that he became totally and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nicolay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  2. United States v. RentfrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  3. United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
  4. United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  5. United States v. HowardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. New York Life Ins. Co. v. StonerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  2. United States v. HigbeeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  3. United States v. BodgeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  4. United States v. AtchleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  5. New York Life Ins. Co. v. StonerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API