Legal Opinion
United States v. Thomson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 18, 1934No. 973PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit to recover upon a war risk insurance contract. A jury was waived. The court found that the insured became totally and permanently disabled on June 1, 1920, while the policy was in force and effect.’ Judgment was rendered in his favor, and this appeal followed.
The finding of total and permanent disability is challenged. We are told that it Í3 not supported by substantial evidence. Under the often-repeated rule, the burden rested upon the insured to show by substantial evidence that he became so disabled while the policy was in force. United States v.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nicolay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. IveyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Stallman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tyson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- American Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
- United States v. BodgeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Hartness v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.