Legal Opinion

Redd Chemical & Nitrate Co. v. W. T. Clay Mercantile Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 28, 1929No. 8 Div. 52PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This appeal is prosecuted’ by the complainant in the court below from a decree sustaining the demurrers of the defendant Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank to the bill as last amended, and the case was submitted without assignment of errors on the record, as required by the rules of practice of this court. The decree is due to be affirmed. Nichols v. Hardegree, 202 Ala. 132, 79 So. 598.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nichols v. HardegreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Esslinger v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Morton v. National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Ex Parte MortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Kinsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  5. Robinson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API