Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Hardegree

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 27, 1918No. 7 Div. 845PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clay County; Hugh D. Merrill, Judge. Action between J. T. Nichols and R. M. Hardegree. From judgment for the latter, the former .appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

McOLELLAN, j.

The failure of the appellant to assign any errors requires the affirmance of the judgment below. Rule 1, Supreme Court Prac. (20 South. iv); Civil Code, p. 1506; Pettibone v. Bank, 156 Ala. 666, 46 South. 751; Amerson v. Corona Coal Co., 194 Ala. 175, 69 South. 601; Kinnon v. L. & N. R. R. Co., 187 Ala. 480, 65 South. 397; Dickens v. Dickens, 174 Ala. 345, 56 South. 809; Brahan v. Collins, Minor, 169; Chavers v. Mayo, ante, p. 128, 79 South. 594.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and MAYFIELD and THOMAS,' JJ., concur.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Amerson v. Corona Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Kinnon v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Chavers v. MayoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. Dickens v. DickensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Congress of Industrial Organizations v. McAdorySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Wetzel v. HobbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Nostrand v. LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Dobson v. DeasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Redd Chemical & Nitrate Co. v. W. T. Clay Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API