Legal Opinion

John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Moore

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1876PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error to Wayne Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, J:

The suit below was on a life policy in favor of William Todd, who was claimed to be dead, but whose death was sought to be proved by his disappearance, aided by circumstantial testimony.

The defense relied on was, first, that he was not shown to be dead, and second, that if dead he died by his own act. The policy contained this clause: “3. That in case the person whose life is hereby insured shall die by his own hand,” &c., &c., &c., “this policy shall be void, and the company shall not be liable for the loss.”

An error is alleged on the reception in evidence of the' letters of…

2Cited by26 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Grand Lodge Independent Order of Mutual Aid v. WietingIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Provident Life & Accident Ins. v. PrietoTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Supreme Tent Knights of Maccabees of the World v. StenslandIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. LyonsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API