Legal Opinion
State v. Risty
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 9, 1927No. File No. 6242PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPodeey, J.
This is an original action brought by the state for the purpose of enjoining and restraining the defendants from apportioning benefits and levying assessments against the land of plaintiff for the construction of that certain improvement designated as drainage ditch No. I and 2 in Minnehaha county. The defendants Risty, Olsen, Even, Alguire, and Stringham are the members of the board of county commissioners of said county. Dale E. Howe is auditor, and McFarland is treasurer of said county.
The improvement involved in this case is the same that was involved in Gilseth v. Risty, 46 S. D. 374,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Risty v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Ross v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- City of Indianapolis v. NavinIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Kraus v. LehmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Rothschild & Co. v. Sons Piano Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Southern Valley Grain Dealers Ass'n v. Board of County CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Chester v. EinarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
- McDonald v. PritzlIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. GraffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
- Barnes v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.