Legal Opinion

City of Indianapolis v. Navin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1897No. 18,246PublishedCited by 54 opinions

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This action was brought by appellant to collect the penalty provided for the violation of an ordinance, in refusing to pay the fare of five cents prescribed by said ordinance for riding upon a car of the Citizens’ Street Railway Company. Appellee filed an answer admitting the passing of the ordinánce, and its validity, and that he had ridden as alleged, and had refused to pay the fare of five cents demanded, but justified such refusal under the act approved March 6, 1897 (Acts 1897, p. 201), amending section 9 of the law providing for the incorporation of street railways, and adding…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Stone v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Covington & Lexington Turnpike Road Co. v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Budd v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Buford v. DanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  2. Ladd v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State v. BarrettIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Central Trust Co. of New York v. Citizens' St. Ry. Co. of IndianapolisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1897
  5. Roth v. State ex rel. KurtzIndiana Supreme Court · 1902

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API