Legal Opinion

Kraus v. Lehman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1908No. 21,212PublishedCited by 45 opinions

Prom Cass Circuit Court; John S. Lairy, Judge. Claim by Israel Lehman and another against Miami county. Prom an allowance by the board of commissioners, Milton Kraus appeals. Prom a judgment for claimants in the circuit court, he again appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under subd. 2, §1394 Burns 1908, Acts 1901, p. 565, §10.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

An act of the legislature, approved February 21, 1899, is involved in this appeal (Acts 1899, p. 73, §5903 Bums 1908). The act in question is entitled: “An act concerning the construction of court-houses in counties having a popnlation of more than 25,000 as shown by the last preceding United States census, and declaring an emergency.” Section one, omitting the enacting clause, is as follows: ‘ ‘ That it shall be unlawful for the board of county commissioners of any county having a population of more than 25,000, as shown by the last preceding United States census, to order or contract for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bedford Quarries Co. v. BoughIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Gentile v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Martin v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Town of Longview v. City of CrawfordsvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Edmonds v. HerbrandsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Fountain Park Co. v. HenslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Martin's Executors v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  3. Hogston v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. v. McCullomIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Hatfield v. GarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API