Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Great Northern Railway Co. v. Graff

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1947No. File No. 8883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

A pétition praying for the abandonment of the drainage district and works described in State v. Risty, 51 S. D. 336, 213 N. W. 952, was filed with the auditor of Minnehaha county and thereafter the Board of County Commissioners noticed it for hearing. Thereupon, plaintiff made application to the trial court.for a writ of prohibition on the ground that Ch. 290, Laws 1939, pursuant to which the Board of County Commissioners was proceeding, was unconstitutional and void. An alternative writ was issued. Subsequently an order was entered by the court quashing the writ so issued. The plaintiff has…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Dodge v. Board of Ed. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. State v. MorganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  4. State Ex Rel. Botkin v. WelshSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  5. United States v. FloreaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kneip v. HersethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Lee Enterprises, Inc v. Iowa State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  3. Berdahl v. GillisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Brekke v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  5. City of Sioux Falls v. GraffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API