Legal Opinion

Darlington v. Butler

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1906No. Civ. No. 194PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of El Dorado County, and from an order denying a new trial. N. D. Arnot, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

This is an action to determine the respective rights of the parties to certain school land situated in El Dorado county. Plaintiff had judgment from which and from the order denying his motion for a new trial intervener Kohn appeals.

The record presents the following facts: In 1888, defendant Butler filed her application in the state land office to purchase the land; thereafter one Graham filed therein a similar application, and on demand and protest of Graham the surveyor general referred the conflicting claims of Graham and Butler to the superior court for adjudication,- on May 4, 1889, a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Pacific Paving Co. v. VizelichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Marks v. KeenanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Swortfiguer v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Youle v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Scrimsher v. Reliance Rock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Burks v. BronsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. E. Clemens Horst Co. v. Federal Mutual Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. McMahan's of Long Beach v. McMahan Service Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API