Gullick v. Interstate Drilling Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.
This appeal purports to be one from a judgment of nonsuit. Whether it is will" depend upon the conclusion reached upon the contention of the respondents that the appeal should be dismissed. Heretofore a motion was made by them for a dismissal of the appeal and was by this court denied. (Gullick v. Interstate Drilling Co., 100 Cal. App. 243 [279 Pac. 828].) Since that time they have made a motion for diminution of the record which was granted, and the record is now supplemented by a copy of the minutes of the court for October 15, 1928, the material part of which reads as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Berger v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Anderson v. GoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Paul v. CragnazNevada Supreme Court · 1900
- Ferris v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Weyl v. Sonoma Valley R.R.California Supreme Court · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Scrimsher v. Reliance Rock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Chinnis v. Pomona Pump Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- McClurken v. Ralph's Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Neblett v. NeblettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Carpenter v. Golden State Securities Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.