Calkins v. Steinbach
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Santa Barbara, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts appear in the ^opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
-The case made by the complaint is this: Three persons—Gallagher, Mahé and Paviller—were seized in fee of certain lands. Being so seized, they executed a mortgage upon the lands, to secure the payment of their promissory note to Gasper Orena and wife.
The mortgage was subsequently foreclosed, because of default in the payment of the money ; and under and pursuant to the decree of foreclosure, the lands were regularly sold at public auction to one Le Roy, for $18,837.89, who received from the sheriff a proper certificate of sale, which was duly recorded in the county where the lands were…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Stock v. MeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Pepin v. StricklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Carson v. BroadyNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Grant v. De OtteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Keel v. VinyardIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.