Legal Opinion
Pacific Fruit Exchange v. Schropfer
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 2, 1929No. Docket No. 6755PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The defendant, who was a tenant in possession of certain real property, appeals from a judgment entered against him for the rent which accrued subsequent to the sale of the property under an execution.
The judgment upon which the execution issued was recovered by the plaintiff against F. F. Stober and Anna D. Stober on July 23, 1926, and their interest in the property was purchased by the plaintiff at an execution sale on January 17, 1927, following which a sheriff’s certificate of sale was duly issued and recorded. The record title to the property stood in the name of Anna D.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Smith v. YuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Winnisimmet Trust, Inc. v. LibbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Garber v. GianellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Schumacher v. TrumanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Caito v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Gates Rubber Co. v. UlmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Pepin v. StricklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Long v. W. P. Devereux Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930