Legal Opinion
Holmes v. S. H. Kress & Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 15, 1924No. 12805PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
-Opinion toy
JONES, C.
This suit was originally instituted in. the district court of Tulsa county, by plaintiff in error, against the defendants in error, to recover judgment against the defendants on a contract for work, labor, and services rendered, and material furnished in and about the construction of a) certain building in Tulsa, Okla., for the defendant
S. H. Kress & Company, and to foreclose a mechanics’ lien and materialman’s lien on the property of said company, and for an attorney’s fee of $300. It was admitted by the defendant S. H. Kress & Company, at the trial that the amount…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holland Banking Co. v. DicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Avery v. ButlerOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Neves v. MillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Schaller-Hoerr Co. v. GentileAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910
- Woodruff v. HoveySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Liberty Plan Co. v. Francis T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. ThurmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Bilby v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Holiday Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Town of ComancheSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.