Legal Opinion

State v. Muller

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 6, 1984No. C6-83-2060PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

On October 19, 1983, appellant was found guilty by a jury of theft over $2500 in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.52, subds. 2(1), 3(1) (1982). Appellant claims the State’s evidence was insufficient, as a matter of law, to sustain his conviction. Appellant also claims the trial court erred by admitting certain Spreigl and expert testimony. Last, appellant contends the trial court’s imposition of $10,000 restitution was erroneous because the jury did not reach a conclusion regarding the specific amount of theft. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant was the manager of the East Side Gas…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. State v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. State v. HelterbridleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. State v. McGeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. State v. FossenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. State v. DendyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. State v. LatimerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  4. In Re the Welfare of D.D.G.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  5. State v. BelfryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API