State v. Muller
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
On October 19, 1983, appellant was found guilty by a jury of theft over $2500 in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.52, subds. 2(1), 3(1) (1982). Appellant claims the State’s evidence was insufficient, as a matter of law, to sustain his conviction. Appellant also claims the trial court erred by admitting certain Spreigl and expert testimony. Last, appellant contends the trial court’s imposition of $10,000 restitution was erroneous because the jury did not reach a conclusion regarding the specific amount of theft. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant was the manager of the East Side Gas…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- State v. HelterbridleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. McGeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. FossenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. DendyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. LatimerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- In Re the Welfare of D.D.G.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. BelfryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.