Legal Opinion
State v. Belfry
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 15, 1987No. CX-87-1485PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
This appeal is from an order, pursuant to sentence previously imposed, with execution stayed, requiring appellant Richard Belfry to pay, as a condition of probation, restitution to victims of a theft by swindle of which he was convicted. See State v. Belfry, 353 N.W.2d 224 (Minn.Ct.App.1984), pet. for rev. denied (Minn. October 30, 1984). We affirm.
FACTS
In 1982 Belfry was charged with one count of theft by swindle, alleged to have occurred against eight named individuals. See Minn.Stat. § 609.52, subd. 2(4) and (5)(a) (1982). The facts of the offense are summarized…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. FaderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. MullerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. BelfryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. LaycockUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Kirby v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- State v. DeAngelisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- Fore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.