Legal Opinion

State v. Dendy

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 12, 1994No. C6-93-2481PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellant challenges restitution order requiring him to reimburse his landlord for damages to his apartment door caused by police when executing a search warrant. We reverse.

FACTS

Police obtained a “no-knock” search warrant for premises leased to appellant Samuel Earl Dendy. In executing the warrant, the police forcibly entered Dendy’s apartment, damaging the door. Dendy subsequently pleaded guilty to a fifth degree controlled substance offense for possession of cocaine. Landlord Allan Cederberg then sought restitution from Dendy for police damage to the apartment. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. State v. HarwellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  4. State v. MullerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. In Re the Welfare of J.A.D.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  3. State of Minnesota v. Almanzo Ousley CottonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2023
  4. State of Minnesota v. Almanzo Ousley CottonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2023
  5. State of Minnesota v. Almanzo Ousley CottonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API