Legal Opinion

Gallenthin Realty Development, Inc. v. Borough of Paulsboro

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 13, 2007PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Zazzali

Gallenthin Realty Development, Inc. owns a sixty-three-acre parcel of largely vacant wetlands in the Borough of Paulsboro. In 2003, Paulsboro classified the Gallenthin property as “in need of redevelopment” under N.J.S.A 40A:12A-5(e) because the property’s unimproved condition rendered it “not fully productive.” Such a classification subjects property to taking by eminent domain. N.J.S.A 40A:12A-8(c). The trial court and Appellate Division upheld Paulsboro’s redevelopment designation.

Because the New Jersey Constitution authorizes government redevelopment of only “blighted areas,” we conclude…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  3. Gangemi v. BerrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  4. State v. ProfaciSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  5. Jersey City Chapter of Property Owner's Protective Ass'n v. City Council of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Alloway Township and County of Salem and William R. CobbNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
  2. Allstate New Jersey Ins. Co. v. Gregorio Lajara (073511)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  3. Harrison Redevelopment Agency v. DeRoseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  4. Whirlpool Properties, Inc. v. DIR., DIV. OF TAX.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  5. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. HuberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API