Taylor v. Cessna Aircraft Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.
—Virgil Taylor and Judy Alexander appeal from the trial court's refusal to grant their motions for new trial, and contend (1) certain evidence was erroneously admitted at trial; (2) defense counsel gave improper closing arguments; and (3) that they are entitled to a new trial a d sanctions based upon newly discovered evidence and misconduct in connection with discovery violations. We reverse.
On August 31, 1976, a Cessna TU-206F, piloted by John D. Alexander, took off from Spokane and made intermediate stops in Lewiston and Pasco before returning that evening. Passengers aboard were Charles…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- State v. CaseWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. MoquinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Harry G. Seaboldt v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company (Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff) v. Thompson Mahogany Company (Third-Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- Snedigar v. HoddersenWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Matter of Firestorm 1991Washington Supreme Court · 1996
- Johnson v. MermisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- Mitchell v. Washington State Institute of Public PolicyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.