Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Mermis

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 18, 1998No. 39479-7-IPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

— Attorney Richard Llewelyn Jones appeals an order imposing sanctions for CR 11 and 37 violations arising out of his representation of John Mermis. Because Jones violated an order compelling discovery and engaged in multiple discovery abuses, we hold that the court properly imposed sanctions. We reject Jones’s other assigned errors because they are either without merit or not properly before this court. Finally, we impose terms for Jones’s frivolous appeal.

FACTS

Terry Johnson sued John Mermis for replevin and damages arising out of the alleged sale of a Dodge Viper automobile. They had orally…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bryant v. Joseph Tree, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Gammon v. Clark Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Palmer v. JensenWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Camer v. Seattle Post-IntelligencerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Hollis v. Garwall, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In re the Marriage of FioritoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. Woods v. BailetCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. State v. G.A.H.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. State v. GAHCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API