Legal Opinion
Harry G. Seaboldt v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company (Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff) v. Thompson Mahogany Company (Third-Party Defendant)
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 20, 1961No. 13444-13446PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment against the Pennsylvania Railroad for personal injuries suffered by Harry G. Seaboldt, the plaintiff, and against the Railroad in its action against Thompson Mahogany Company (Thompson), third-party defendant.
The plaintiff alleged injury from a back strain suffered when he was endeavoring to open a gate which led into Thompson’s premises. The Railroad had a siding into Thompson’s yard. This siding was protected by a gate which was kept locked. When railroad cars were taken to or from the siding it was, of course, necessary to unlock…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Eric McNello v. John B. Kelly, Inc. v. B. J. Lucarelli and Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. MoquinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Booth-Kelly Lumber Co. v. Southern Pacific Co. Southern Pacific Co. v. Booth-Kelly Lumber CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Dobry Flour Mills, IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Cacey v. Virginian Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Anne Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., Anne Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Schultz v. NORTHEAST ILL. REGIONAL COMMUTER RAILROAD CORP.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Garcia v. PeeplesTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. DriverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.