Legal Opinion

Fulcher v. Pine Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1926PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

Defendant’s first assignment of error is based upon an incident, occurring during the trial, and stated in the case on appeal as follows:

“Tbe plaintiff, in examining tbe jury, asked tbe question, Is there any member of tbe jury in tbe employ of tbe Tbomas Hasten Indemnity Insurance Company or Association V ”

When tbe question was asked, tbe judge called tbe attorneys for plaintiff and defendant to tbe bench, and in an undertone, not beard by tbe jury, asked why plaintiff’s attorneys desired to ask tbe question. Plaintiff’s attorneys, in an undertone, not beard by tbe jury, said to tbe judge…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Clark v. Bonsal & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. West Construction Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Blevins v. Erwin Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. Deligny v. Tate Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Allen v. . GaribaldiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Austin v. . OvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Elder v. Plaza RailwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Scott v. . BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Davis v. . JeffreysSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API