Legal Opinion · Dissent

McKinnon v. . Motor Lines

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1947PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1DissentSeawell, J.

Civil actions by H. A. McKinnon and Robert H. McKinnon, father and son, for damages to the father's automobile and for personal injuries to the son when the father's car, driven at the time by the son on Highway No. 27 in Montgomery County, ran into the rear of a truck and trailer owned by Howard Motor Lines, Inc., and operated at the time by an employee, Robert Lee McFadden, it being alleged that the damages in both instances were caused by the negligence or default of the defendants. As both actions arise out of the same circumstances and rest upon the same evidence, by consent, they were…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Atkins v. . Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Tarrant Ex Rel. Tarrant v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. West Construction Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Tyson v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Spivey v. NewmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. White v. MoteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Morris v. Jenrette Transport Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Owens v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API