Legal Opinion

Godwin v. Johnson Cotton Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 25, 1953No. 243PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

The defendant assigns as error the refusal of the court below to sustain its motion for judgment of nonsuit.

The plaintiff, as in all cases where a motion for judgment of nonsuit is interposed, is entitled to have her evidence considered in the light most favorable to her and to the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom. Edwards v. Vaughn, ante, 89, 76 S.E. 2d 359; Morrisette v. Boone Co., 235 N.C. 162, 69 S.E. 2d 239; Chambers v. Allen, 233 N.C. 195, 63 S.E. 2d 212; Bundy v. Powell, 229 N.C. 707, 51 S.E. 2d 307. Moreover, on such a motion, evidence offered by the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. West Construction Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Chambers Ex Rel. Chambers v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Primm v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. Price v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Smith v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Tew v. RunnelsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Simmons v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API