Legal Opinion

Absher v. City of Raleigh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1937PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.

The evidence on the issue of contributory negligence is not all one way. It is sufficiently equivocal and contradictory to require its submission to the jury. Doyle v. Charlotte, 210 N. C., 709; Williams v. Bus Co., ibid., 400, 186 S. E., 482; Oldham v. R. R., ibid., 642. Compare Casque v. Asheville, 207 N. C., 821, 178 S. E., 848. “A serious and troublesome question is continually arising as to bow far a court will declare certain conduct of a defendant negligence and certain conduct of a plaintiff contributory negligence and take away tbe question of negligence and contributory…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. West Construction Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Moseley v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Davis v. . JeffreysSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Fulcher v. Pine Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Pemberton v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Atkins v. . Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Tyson v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Atkins v. White Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Austin v. . OvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API